Category Archives: Resistance to Tyranny is Obedience to God

The Problem With Christians

Two of the problems that American Christians have (in this case Canadian Christians, but I have some familiarity with Canadian Christians, and know that they share these problems with Americans) is that they often use a false definition of “church”, and that they seem incapable of differentiating between valid and invalid authorities.

That is touched on by these Canadians being harassed for meeting on Sundays despite their evil government’s order to stop due to the coronasniffles. They have all of a sudden grown a spine, and that has been my hope for what the silver lining of this travesty would be for all of us.

Their response to the government is mostly good. You can see it here. But here are their serious errors.

Problem 1
“For years we have taught our children to respect police…”

Police have shown little to no evidence that they’re willing to ignore unjust laws. They’ve never hinted that they would do anything other than what evil politicians tell them, even standing by while 60 million babies are murdered. Teaching our children to respect police is foolish. Their abuse at the hands of police is them reaping what they’ve sown. Hopefully this incident helps them gain repentance on this issue.

Problem 2
The second problem is equivocating on the definition of church:
“Our Saviour shed His blood to purchase the church, and therefore deeming the church ‘unessential’ is tantamount to deeming the blood of Christ unessential, which is a public act of blasphemy.”

Their first use of the word church refers to the body of believers (people). Their second use of church refers to the meeting they have on Sunday morning. The government didn’t say the people purchased by Christ are unessential; it said their meeting is unessential.

That being said, fellowship is essential, and hopefully they continue to defy evil government and evil police.

We Get The Government We Deserve

I can’t believe there are still people who are sold-out sycophants hanging on every word of government quacks. Have they not been paying attention for the last few months?

First, they institute lockdowns and say that masks are useless. They see riots and they make exceptions to corona lockdown regulations for rioting. Tests and statistics have been shown to be utterly useless and unreliable, so no one really even has good data to make even an educated guess. But that doesn’t stop them from threatening you with fines and jail time and destroying businesses. Now, supposedly, cases are rising, but rather than going back to lockdowns, they start requiring masks. They know people will go nuts if there are lockdowns and that lockowns were utterly ineffective, but they want to continue to put you in your place. So put this fabric over your face as a placebo and a virtue signal and keep your mouth shut. I can’t believe that the majority of people actually are wearing masks.

Government health “experts” have proven themselves to be completely unreliable. So stop relying on them.

Awesome Quote

Nicholas Perez writes, “Foreign dictators like the Federal Beast, and the 50 States are not civil governments by a Biblical standard. These tyrants have conquered us, and if we call evil good by legitimizing their rule, we will never put them under Christ’s feet.”

“We must work/pray together toward peaceful rebellion, and undermine the Beast from all angles–voting and running for office are not excluded from our subterfuge. What cannot be tolerated is calling the Beast a “civil government.” For Christians, civil governments is an institution prescribed by God’s law. It must not be confounded with foreign dictators, such as we see in D.C.. How can we ever defeat evil if we call evil good?”

Good Point

“What if I proposed that we hand three sticks of dynamite and a detonator to anyone who asked for them. All an applicant would need is money to pay for the explosives. You’d have to be an idiot to agree with my plan—at least based on the assumptions you picked up in school about human nature and human competence. And yet gasoline, a spectacularly mischievous explosive, dangerously unstable and with the intriguing characteristic as an assault weapon that it can flow under locked doors and saturate bulletproof clothing, is available to anyone with a container. Five gallons of gasoline have the destructive power of a stick of dynamite. The average (automobile) tank holds fifteen gallons, yet no background check is necessary for dispenser or dispensee. As long as gasoline is freely available, gun control is beside the point.” – John Taylor Gatto

Cheering for tyranny

Why are our freedoms vanishing? Is it because the tyrants are so clever and they are able to overcome the wishes of the people? How do we get these freedoms back? Is voting the solution?

Our freedoms are vanishing because that’s what people want. They want to give up their freedom and be under the boot of a tyrant. They cheer for the tyrants.

That is what I see in this Daily Record article. The “conservative” Republican leaders and constituents cheered for an evil building code enforcer. I don’t care how nice he may have been, his job was to make sure that people don’t exercise too much freedom, and to aid in the process of property tax collection. The assessor needs accurate data to collect taxes via the most evil form of taxation.

I’m all for building safe buildings and inspecting the work of others. That is required in Scripture as part of the command to not commit murder. However, government is the worst way to accomplish that, and that was only a small part of this guy’s job. Government is completely out of control in their interference of the building process, and here, this guy gets slapped on the back and congratulated. He is the enemy of freedom and of the principles this country was founded on.

So, NO, the tyranny won’t be solved by voting harder next November, or any November, until a good percentage of the people repent and learn how to discern good and evil. Until guys like this are tarred and feathered rather than congratulated, there is no hope.

Typical Response

Whenever I discuss politics with a Christian, the other person usually ends up quoting Romans 13 to suggest that I ought to shut up and just submit to the government.

This happens so often that I coined a new word to describe this occurence, “romansthirteen”. Here’s the definition.

Of course, the bootlicking, Hitler-glorifying interpretation of Romans 13 most (90+%) of Christians teach is incorrect. Romans 13:3-4 clearly teaches that there is one purpose of government, and that is to be God’s servant to carry out His wrath against evildoers. Any government worker who cares to glorify the Lord in his or her duty, has clear direction on how to do that.

1. Stop attempting to punish people who aren’t committing evil.
2. Stop attempting to collect taxes for anything government does other than punishing evildoers.
3. Be God’s servant to carry out His wrath on evildoers.
4. Stop harassing children with lemonade stands.

Of course, this is a radical idea to Christians who may have read this passage many times without paying attention to what it actually says, and believe that if a cop says kids must have a permit for their lemonade stand, the kids should jump up and go get a street vending permit, a food service license, and a sales tax license. I’ve tried to communicate this true message of Romans 13 to Christians many times online, and even meeting with otherwise knowledgeable people from church in person.

The only counterargument I’ve received is them jumping to some other passage in some other book and trying to explain Romans 13:3-4 away. This is a sure sign of a failed argument.

Whatever biblical doctrine you’re advocating, you must be able to walk through any and all passages and present a clear explanation of what that passage is talking about.

I learned this principle when studying Calvinism and Arminianism. There are passages that appear difficult for both of those systems of thought, and there are passages that initially appear to teach one over the other. The true test for which is correct is to listen to a Calvinist walk through a difficult passage for him, and see if he has a sensible explanation. Then, do the same thing for an Arminian. Of course, you would want to listen to the best and brightest individuals each side has to offer.

Calvinists can walk through 2 Peter 3:9, 1 Timothy 2:1-4 and Matthew 22:37, and explain what those passages are actually talking about in context, in a way that makes sense. Arminians can’t walk through John 6, 8, Ephesians 1, Romans 8:28-30, Romans 9, etc. without jumping to some other passage. This is how we know Arminianism is false.

Anyone can take a few verses out of context, and twist them to teach anything they want. The real test is whether they can make sense of the verses that are difficult for them. Whatever doctrine is true, is true from Genesis to Revelation, in every single passage.

So I’m still looking for someone to explain how Romans 13:3-4 teaches something other than what I’m saying without jumping to some other book of the Bible. Until then, I will support my kids’ black market lemonade stands.

I Volunteer To Get Screwed Over

Social Security sucks. The first woman to receive social security benefits was Ida May Fuller. Feel free to google her for exact numbers, but she paid about $20 into social security, and received about $20,000.



Ida May Fuller was a covetous, greedy bitch, along with almost all others who have accepted Social Security.

Social Security is a wicked Ponzi scheme based on theft, and there is no good way to end it. The only way to end it is for a certain group of people who have have paid in not receive anything. And when I say “paid in”, I actually mean “robbed at gunpoint”. There is always a gun behind tax collection, even if you choose not to see the gun and pay by the due date.

I’m willing to forgive all the Social Security payments I’ve been robbed of to this point, and continue paying in (for a while) without ever receiving any benefits. I’m willing to be the victim of the covetousness and greed of socialists down through American history so that we can end all the greed and covetousness that Social Security causes the average American to engage in.

Baby boomers are fond of mocking younger generations while ripping off the younger generations by accepting their stolen Social Security payments.

One way to end socialism is to have a tax revolt. I have no doubt that would work if you could get enough people to participate. But, there seems to be little appetite for freedom among Americans, so I have to do what I can do, while avoiding prison. I have been on a benefits revolt for many years now. I hope others will join me. It might take a little longer to end socialism and tyranny with a benefits revolt, but if enough people refuse benefits of social security, public school, welfare, etc. we can end those systems.

There is a clear, perfectly legal path to victory over socialism for anyone who cares to take it. Are there enough people with a desire to end socialism?

Trump Supporters

Trump is a tyrant. He might be slightly less tyrannical and nuts than Hillary Clinton, but that’s just a maybe. Evil is evil.

Someone posted this picture in a Trump-supporting Facebook group, and the commenters said some of the funniest things. It’s been pretty fun to go through and tell them that Trump is the one who actually said it.

Trump has done some good things, but he’s also banned bump stocks, and said things like this quote attributed to AOC. Trump supporters make the craziest excuses for him banning bump stocks. They elected a New York liberal, and they can’t just criticize him when he does wrong. So, it makes it all the more fun to catch them mocking AOC for saying something Trump said.

Image may contain: 1 person, smiling, meme and text

Here are some of the comments left by these people. No one has responded when they were told that Trump is the one who actually said that.

“Wow she realy wants a civil war.”

“Typical democrat turd. Doesn’t know what constitutional protections are.”

“Take em early? Before I get it sighted in.”

“This SHOWS her immaturity and ignorance. Growing up in an URBAN setting deprived her of a true understanding of the freedoms afforded to all citizens. She is WILLING to give up these freedoms because she’s been brainwashed into that belief. SO SAD”

“Her 15 minutes of fame is up”

“The woman is an idiot and needs to go back to where she came from.”

“Keep talking BIMBO, you are helping us conservatives. Brain dead idiot.”

“I’m about tired of her.”

“About tired? I’ve been sick of her since about day one when she was still running”

“Nutjob”

A few said their guns will have to be pried from their cold, dead hands. If there was a Democrat president, and the cops came to take the guns, I think that might be true. If Trump is in office, I’m not sure. That is the level of sycophancy in some of these people.

Freedom Is Gone in America

I’ve said this before, but I appreciate hearing the people in this video say it. If the U.S. government can keep putting out the propaganda that we’re the freest and the best, and the rest of the world is a dangerous hellhole, they can get away with more abuse of the citizens and higher taxes without losing us tax cattle to competing governments.

I’d be willing to bet that Mexico has more freedom and more safety than the U.S. I have no doubt that drug cartels in Mexico are dangerous, but the U.S. government is a very dangerous cartel, and many times more powerful.

Another point they make is that the girl’s food allergies went away in Mexico. Like they say, who knows what the problem is, but with much less government intervention, the food is safer in Mexico. MORE REGULATIONS DON’T MAKE US SAFER. GOVERNMENT IS THE PROBLEM.

I don’t have any idea who these people are, or what their beliefs are, but it’s an interesting video, if not a little long. The portion where they talk about freedom starts at the 2:00 mark. The food allergy discussion starts at 8:00.

Is The Supreme Court God?

I don’t want to put words in this lawyer/youtuber’s mouth, but it seems like the Supreme Court is his god. I think he’s correct when he says the Constitution gives the powers they have to the Supreme Court. But does that mean there’s no higher standard to be able to discern whether they are right or wrong on a topic?

At first, I thought this guy was just arguing based on the pragmatics of what the law is, but it seems he really is incapable of determining whether the Supreme Court is right or wrong, or at least has completely submitted to them. If that is the case, the Supreme Court is his god. He would have had no problem with owning slaves before the 13th Amendment. He apparently has no problem with abortion or gay marriage. I can only go by what he’s said, and he never responded to my last question.

I think there are many Christians who give powers that only God has to the state, and in so doing, they are guilty of idolatry.

Another interesting point he made in the original video is that it was William Rehnquist (a conservative justice) who voted in the majority to decide that DUI checkpoints don’t violate the 4th Amendment. Conservative justices have also given us Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton. I say this to point out that the strategy of conservatives in electing a Republican at all costs so that he will be able to appoint conservative justices and turn the tide in this country is nothing more than a pipe dream, and there is no reason to think that it will suddenly start working in the future.

The Constitution has failed. There are some good points to it, but it has given us what we’ve got, which is tyranny.

Here’s the conversation in the comments of his Youtube video. I will happily refrain from watching or commenting on his videos.

I don’t care to link to his video, as someone who thinks slavery, abortion and gay marriage are acceptable if the Supreme Court says so really does have zero credibility, but if you really want to see it, there’s enough information in this article to find it if you wish.