It’s ridiculous when a citizen knows the law better than a cop. What a brave woman standing up to that creep.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFjOnmd1oss
Category Archives: Abolish The Police
Crazy Paranoid Cop
https://youtu.be/9PzlPjyMk5g?t=1m14s
What in the world makes this cop think he can demand that someone who makes him uncomfortable leave a public sidewalk? If he’s such a sissy that a guy with his hand in his pocket makes him so scared, he should leave the area. Who is he to boss another human being around?
If officer safety or fear is a valid reason to search people, they can just claim fear anytime they want and do whatever they want to anyone.
Unbridled Capitalism of Jerry Seinfeld and Eric Garner
In case you don’t remember, Eric Garner was choked to death when he was resisting arrest. He had the audacity to buy cigarettes wholesale and sell them retail. This type of lawless free-market capitalism that tries to go without submitting to the proper government permitting, laws and taxation cannot be allowed.
Mr. Garner didn’t submit to his arrest by the fine, upstanding law men of the NYPD and they had no choice but to choke him to death.
Jerry Seinfeld, the famous comedian similarly tried to help his children run their lemonade stand. Like Garner, Seinfeld didn’t seek the proper permits and licenses. Personally, I’m shocked that Seinfeld didn’t have his larynx crushed until he was lifeless like Garner. Comrades, we must crush unfettered capitalism!
I say all the previous sarcastically. It almost makes me cry to see Garner choked to death. He was murdered. The cops who murdered him should be executed. He should have the right to sell loose cigarettes. And Seinfeld should be able to set up a lemonade stand without government harassment. What we have in this country is outright fascism.
I’m not insinuating that Seinfeld wasn’t choked to death because he’s famous or white. I’m sure he did exactly as the officers said to do. If you do exactly what they say, their egos are stroked; their power trip is a comfortable one, and they will certainly let you live. But the only one Christians are supposed to obey unquestioningly is Christ. We don’t always get the luxury of living a peaceful life.
Garner would still be alive if he had done what the officers said to do. But his attempted arrest was unjust and evil. He will stand before God having not sinned in selling loose cigarettes or resisting his attempted kidnapping. I’m not saying it was wise, and maybe there was some bad luck that he died (though I don’t believe in luck), but the police were enforcing unjust laws, because that’s what cops do.
Fair DUI Flyer Guy Arrested
What makes these cops think they can abuse and harass people like this? Maybe it’s the chief of police standing there watching and approving of what they’re doing.
Intimidation Tactics
Are Unjust Laws Taking People to Hell?
In the second scenario, according to God’s Law, the activist is guilty of murder.
Here’s why, copied from this article that you ought to read in its entirety.
The Difference Between Murder and Homicide
“Now, some say today, “murder” is a strong word. Let’s say they were “homicides,” may be as a result of the use of excessive force, but not necessarily driven by malice or criminal intent. This claim is based on lack of understanding of the Biblical Law. But does the Biblical Law actually speak of the difference between murder and homicide?’
“Yes, it does. A special section in the Law speaks about that difference: Numbers 35:15-28. The first part, vv. 15-21, explains the case for murder:’
These six cities shall be for refuge for the sons of Israel, and for the alien and for the sojourner among them; that anyone who kills a person unintentionally may flee there. But if he struck him down with an iron object, so that he died, he is a murderer; the murderer shall surely be put to death. If he struck him down with a stone in the hand, by which he will die, and as a result he died, he is a murderer; the murderer shall surely be put to death. Or if he struck him with a wooden object in the hand, by which he might die, and as a result he died, he is a murderer; the murderer shall surely be put to death. The blood avenger himself shall put the murderer to death; he shall put him to death when he meets him. If he pushed him of hatred, or threw something at him lying in wait and as a result he died, or if he struck him down with his hand in enmity, and as a result he died, the one who struck him shall surely be put to death, he is a murderer; the blood avenger shall put the murderer to death when he meets him.
“The second part explains the case for unintentional homicide:”
But if he pushed him suddenly without enmity, or threw something at him without lying in wait, or with any deadly object of stone, and without seeing it dropped on him so that he died, while he was not his enemy nor seeking his injury, then the congregation shall judge between the slayer and the blood avenger according to these ordinances. The congregation shall deliver the manslayer from the hand of the blood avenger, and the congregation shall restore him to his city of refuge to which he fled; and he shall live in it until the death of the high priest who was anointed with the holy oil.
“Obviously, the distinction between homicide and murder is in the intention of the killer. But how can we read the mind of a person to know the intention? Since we can’t read minds, the Law gives the solution: Look at what’s in the hand of the killer, and how it is used. If it’s a weapon specifically designed to kill (an iron object), the killer must be clearly tried for murder – I say “must be tried,” because there is still a special case of lawful use of weapons which will be examined below. If the weapon was not specifically designed to kill (stone or wood object), but the movements of the killer’s hand showed intention to strike, then he must be tried for murder, again, allowing for the special case of lawful use of weapons. It’s that simple.”
So, in the second scenario in the video, the activist was guilty of murder under God’s law. If a cop did such a thing, and many have, (many examples having been posted on Youtube) , they take a few paid days off while it is investigated, and are almost always found to be justified and put back on duty. The guy will go the rest of his life thinking he was justified, while in God’s sight, he’s guilty of murder.
Now, the question of whether that takes him to hell can never be answered specifically by us. It’s a case by case basis. Even a murderer commits many other sins that are adequate to take him to hell. And if the murderer cop is not a Christian and never becomes a Christian, you could always say that he should have sought Christ for the forgiveness of his lying, even if he didn’t think he was guilty of murder.
But how can adding such a serious sin to his account help the guy? I don’t think the Bible gets too specific on the punishment for specific sins, but I shudder to think the harm that having unbiblical laws in this country is having on the souls of men.
For the Christian cop who commits murder and gets away with it civilly, his past, present, and future sins are forgiven. His intentional sins are forgiven, and the sins he commits out of ignorance are forgiven. Because Jesus’ blood is of infinite value, and He took all the sins of the elect on the cross. But Christians need to start thinking more clearly on this. This is a big deal.
Then, there is the doctrine of bloodguilt, where if murderers habitually go unpunished in a society, the ground is going to cry out for justice. And we will all suffer for the murder of babies and the murders that aren’t brought to justice because of the unjust laws of our government.
Here’s more about the doctrine of bloodguilt.
Henchmen
Imagine the most evil U.S. Senator you can think of. I imagine Harry Reid, but there are plenty to choose from. He’s voted for some pretty sick things in his day, but he’s never actually gone out trying to enforce any of the laws he’s put in place.
Dingy Harry has probably never carried a gun, much less shot anyone. He’s never swung a night stick at anyone or thrown anyone in the back of a squad car and taken them down for booking. That’s not his thing. He needs men who carry guns on their hips, willing to do what they’re told, and willing to enforce whatever law is dreamed up, without asking questions.
The same thing goes for Ruth Bader Ginsburg. She has a pretty high opinion of herself, thinking that the definition of marriage has been left to her and her peers. But nevertheless, that little old lady won’t be visiting any county clerks brandishing a weapon willing even to kill those who may resist her authority. She has never lacked for men to do whatever wicked thing they’re told to do. It seems even Christian cops do what they’re told.
The Bill of Rights was written in part to protect us from cops. The Fourth Amendment protects us from warrantless searches. Harry and Ruth don’t search people’s property. The Fifth Amendment protects us from having to talk to the cops. Harry and Ruth don’t interrogate people.
The truth is that the argument about what percentage of good cops vs bad cops is that they can only be as good as the laws they enforce. If they enforce unjust laws, they aren’t good cops. If they enforce good laws, and constrain each other to the law, they are good cops. There could be an extra good one or an extra bad one here or there, but on average, they’re only as good as the laws they enforce.
The laws in this country are the pagan laws of a nation under God’s judgment. The cops enforce unjust laws in an unbiblical and un-Constitutional way. Maybe there is a good cop whose particular job doesn’t require him to enforce an unjust law. I don’t know, and can’t think of an example, but I have to leave the possibility open.
I’ll be open to discussing whether there are any good cops when there are hundreds of examples of cops disobeying evil judges and refusing to enforce unjust laws. Until then, they are only as good as the laws they enforce.
Evil and Retarded Cop
This cop is evil for stealing money. But I suspect he may also be mildly retarded.
Flags at Half Mast?
Bojidar Marinov:
If the flags around this country were half mast to honor every civilian person murdered by cops, we will never be able to raise them full mast.
Just think about it, and think about the statism of a society that gives one government agent immeasurably more honor than to its multitude of murdered civilians.
One Good County Clerk?
Maybe there are a handful of good county clerks, but it is an extremely small percentage who are refusing to issue same-sex marriage licenses.
For some reason, these homosexuals think that a piece of paper from the government can make their marriage something more than a fantasy. Two dudes can never be married, regardless of what the supreme court says.
Jesus said, “But from the beginning of creation, ‘God made them male and female.’ ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate” (Mark 10:6-9).
I thought it was interesting what Bojidar Marinov said about this situation today:
It is ironic to see that cop-worshippers among the church-goers in the US support Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis in her rebellion against the highest human judicial authority in the land.
It will be even more ironic when cops come to arrest her and remove her from office. What possible explanation will they have to make cops be “good” while serving illegal orders for an evil cause?
But I don’t expect cop-worshippers to change their minds. After all, after 1973, police has been the institution most committed to doggedly defending the abortion mills, not stopping before using torture, murder, and false witness against pro-lifers; and yet, cop-worshippers continue worshipping police. That’s because cop-worship is a religion, and no rational or moral – let alone Biblical – arguments can make its adherents change their minds.